The Greatest Guide To Dianetics

All about Dianetics

I couldn't ever before not want to get anything that comes to mind for you- if it was otherwise, I would not be sitting right here with you, doing this. I not only might never have a problem, or not desire to hear something that comes to mind for you, but I'm completely eager to know every concept, every idea, every image or sensation that emerges or shows up for you- do not ever before think otherwise, and if somehow you do, please just allow me know! In some cases, you may have a thought, and image, concept or occurrence appear that does not appear to respond to the question, or associate with it, yet nonetheless, constantly do inform me regarding it, and as we proceed, the relevance will certainly arise for you.


This is intrinsic in the basis of processing, and the topic of this discussion: the fundamental functions of the counselor and the customer: The fundamental duty of the therapist is, as opposed to "basic training", not to regulate, which suggests to impose and/or prevent, yet to rather work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CUSTOMER.


In subjective handling, regardless of what was claimed in one's training products, the cpu is not there "to manage" the customer. As a matter of fact, the cpu is there to approve the client the liberty and undistracted emphasis to process and share what materializes, and what manifests is what arises when the client resolves the product that associates with their very own objectives for the handling, and for their life.

Things about Dianetics

John Mcmasters expressed this standard reality incredibly well in one of his lectures on Power handling, wherein he clarifies just how he was asked what this "unique propensity" was that he had for providing such great sessions; he had to think regarding that for a minute, and spotted that it was what he had not been doing, as well as what he was doing: he wasn't examining, evaluating, computer, or actually, producing any kind of thoughts, let alone spoken expressions, after providing the command and while waiting on the PC to complete their response to their complete satisfaction; he was, merely and only, being existing with the PC, and totally interested.




The duty of the counselor, showed; that was his "unique knack". I have had my own experience which showed me this well, extremely early in the game. In 1982, having just recently finished my training and internship on New Period Dianetics, I was running this on a PC, and there was a factor in the session where (being a bit wet behind the ears not yet having numerous hours under my belt as a specialist auditor) the PC seemed to be "taking as well lengthy" to express anything verbally click now after I provided him a command.


This trick ended up being the most useful contribution that John ever before made to the topic of treatment or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my modest viewpoint, it is the biggest payment that any person has actually ever made to these subjectsthe application is entirely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and without any pointer, advice or opinion.no preconditioned schedule for her response individuals, or 'levels' that they need to do


In Scientology we prided ourselves on not assessing for individuals. All that really meant was that the auditor did not VERBALLY evaluate for the PC in session.

Getting The Dianetics To Work

The Scientology Bridge is exceptionally evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we chalked up the difference in results to John's improvisational abilities and experience. Nonetheless, upon further examination, particular variables involved lightIt was not a matter of what he WAS doing that the various other specialists weren't, however rather what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Any person who had actually ever seen John audit might not assist however observe a distinct top quality in his auditing."The client's standard duty is to be there with the purpose of relocating in the instructions of their spiritual goals, and to freely and totally reveal and experience whatever manifests for them in addressing the concerns and implementing the directions in the handling.


This is something to procedure as needed. Yet likewise, individuals often have previous experience and/or indoctrination in auditing/processing which, in some ways, and to some degrees, in fact misdirects them right into attitudes, concepts and habits patterns that protect against the complete awareness of these duties, and so they will have a tendency to inhibit the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples offered over. * The very first, and perhaps primary instances you can find out more of mis-indoctrination resulting in less than totally smooth and efficient sessions, can be discovered in specific elements of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are typically an individual's first, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will take place to describe what I view as the flaws in concept and technique, nevertheless, tend to be considerably healing, done as they are offered (Hubbard urges that "TR's are not processing, they are training", yet factually, they are both processing AND training)


Alan Walter made comparable observations, and boosted on these with his "Visibility Processes". There is no "failing", and no rejection of the truth of this being handling. The focus, as it needs to be, gets on experiencing the various other person's existence. All the manifestations which get a "flunk" in doing "TR-0" are simply the being's efforts to stand up to the other individual's existence, and instead of being pestered and badgered with "Flunk", which imposes "failing!" on the being, one simply requires to be urged to "stick their feet in the water a little deeper", to progressively rehabilitate their capability and readiness to totally share and experience "being here", or "visibility", with others.

Our Dianetics PDFs

I wait till the customer takes a look at me as if to claim "I'm done answering, over to you, what's next?" As long as the customer is looking elsewhere than back at the counselor, they are still refining the inquiry or command. Bear in mind "a silent auditor invites itsa"; the customer is still processing, until their focus plainly goes back to the therapist.